Q Introduction Employee Value Proposition-Is it good enough? Unit Learning Outcomes • Assess practical significance of application forms, bio-data, and reference checks. (1) • Design content valid situational and behavioral interviews (5) • Assess practical significance of various ability tests. (6) • Assess practical significance of integrity tests. (6) • Assess practical significance of work sample tests. (7) • Appraise strategies to limit adverse impact in the interview process. (1) • Evaluate personality testing (6) Directions Answer the following questions: 1. Research a job position at your current organization, or an organization you prefer. Develop 2 behavioral and 2 situational questions for the interview. Include an anchored scoring system for all of the questions. 2. In addition to the interview, you want to add another selection assessment to accompany the structured interview questions you designed. Select one, and give your recommendations, with support, for why it should be chosen above the others. Submission Requirements The submission should: • be 8 pages • include a title and reference page • follow APA 7th edition formatting • include 5 outside sources o Note: These should be primarily from professional, e.g. Harvard Business Review, and scholarly sources e.g. Personnel Psychology, Journal of Management, or Academy of Management Review Due Date • By 11:59 p.m., Sunday, CT Rubric Recruitment Project Recruitment Project Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent 100 to >99.0 pts Exceeds Expectations Addresses specifics of assignment demonstrating critical thinking abilities by synthesizing research. A minimum of 5 professional/scholarly outside sources used. 99 to >79.0 pts Meets Expectations Demonstrates understanding of content but greater development needed. A minimum of 2 scholarly outside sources used. 79 to >0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations Opinion based commentary with one or no scholarly outside sources. 100 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Formatting 25 to >24.0 pts Exceeds Expectations All aspects of APA formatting followed. 24 to >20.0 pts Meets Expectations No more than 1-2 APA formatting errors. 20 to >0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations No more than 3 APA formatting errors. 25 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar/Spelling Tone 25 to >24.0 pts Exceeds Expectations Professional 3rd person perspective used with little to no spelling/grammar errors. 24 to >20.0 pts Meets Expectations Professional 3rd person perspective used with no more than 1-2 spelling/grammar error. 20 to >0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations Casual tone used with more than 2 spelling/grammar errors. 25 pts Total Points: 150 PreviousNext